![proteus 8 excessive cpu load proteus 8 excessive cpu load](https://www.circuitstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Proteus-Selection-of-Component-Mode.png)
- #Proteus 8 excessive cpu load pro
- #Proteus 8 excessive cpu load code
- #Proteus 8 excessive cpu load Pc
(ADC conversion clock period (5e-7 violates the minimum required TAD time). I chose the period to be result*7 but I should multiply "result" with a factor that gives me a 100% futy cycle if the result of the adc conversion is maximum and 0% if the result of the adc conversion is minimum.Īnd about this cpu excessive load, does this error exist in pic or only in simulators? Setup_power_pwm(PWM_FREE_RUN, 1, 0, POWER_PWM_PERIOD, 0, 1,2) Compare Postscale = 1 (Postscaler for Compare value) Compare = 0 (Timebase value for special event trigger) Period = 2000 (0-4095) Max value of PWM TimeBase TimeBase = 0 (0-65355) Initial value of PWM Timebase Postscale = 1 (1-16) Timebase output postscaler Setup_power_pwm_pins(PWM_COMPLEMENTARY, PWM_off, PWM_Off, PWM_Off) Setup the 4 Power PWM channels as ordinary pwm channels. #define POWER_PWM_PERIOD 199 // 10 KHz pwm freq with 8 MHz osc.
![proteus 8 excessive cpu load proteus 8 excessive cpu load](https://i0.wp.com/allpcworlds.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Proteus-Professional-8.11-Free-Download.png)
#fuses INTRC_IO, NOWDT, NOPROTECT, NOBROWNOUT, PUT If I run my program in mplab using the mplab plug-in tool I can burn my program using pickit ? (Someone already answered this but I prefer a much detailed answer if there's any).
![proteus 8 excessive cpu load proteus 8 excessive cpu load](https://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2018052517075800-e7260330e4b7d47c63ff99ba9689d77c.jpg)
Surprisingly my program worked (with the 18f1330).
#Proteus 8 excessive cpu load code
I was thinking about using this 1330 instead of 4331 because the power pwm simulation worked for this 1330 and the same code didn't work for the 4331. In the file 18f1330.h I found that the parameter is declared #define NC_NC_NC 0x00 (there's a " _NC" missing ) Setup_Oscillator parameter not selected from Intr Oscillotar Config tab Setup_comparator(NC_NC_NC_NC) // This device COMP currently not supported by the PICWizard I tried to open a new project with the pic 1330.Īnyway without even writing a code i got some errors. I think that there's something wrong with my CCS. The frequency is stable at 10Khz (period=199 for a 8 mhz oscillator).Ĭan someone combine these 2 programs in one program ?Īnd by the way if i didn't use Proteus I would probably never have found out that if I don't feed the MCLR pin the program might not work.Īnd is there any other simulater (other than proteus, that works the same way, i will gladly get it if it works)Īnd PCM programmer, yes your program works, and as i said before it's on the pic 1330, and i edited it and had successfully generated 2 complementary pwms but that cpu load was my problem, while your original program that generated 3 power pwms without their complementary worked with a cpu load of 50%Īnd one more thing, when i create a new source file and i compile, most of the times the output files are generated in another folder that contains another program, why ? The result of the analog to digital conversion will determine my duty cycle. Now I need to combine both and my program is almost done. The first was an analog to digital converter (and it worked in Proteus with the 4331) and the other is the power pwm that only worked with the 1330. My problem with the 1330 is the CPU load.Īnyway guys, you have seen 2 functioning programs that I mentioned in this thread. Mike, the PIC is 1330 and not 1331, and the problem of these configuration bits things is happening with the pic4331 and not with the 1330.
![proteus 8 excessive cpu load proteus 8 excessive cpu load](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-dXlJa-e-III/Vm1Zph4m6gI/AAAAAAAAACA/gu41p7ovmoY/s1600/25.jpg)
Send them to in writing in C language for a pic18f4331 Please do not post bug Reports on this forum.
#Proteus 8 excessive cpu load pro
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB X2 in RAID 0, 960 PRO 1TB DIMM.CCS :: View topic - help in writing in C language for a pic18f4331įAQ Forum Help Official CCS Support Search Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log inĬCS does not monitor this forum on a regular basis.
#Proteus 8 excessive cpu load Pc
Watcha think? I'm pretty new to oc'ing but 5.2 on all cores and so far seeming pretty stable seems like a good chip? If you haven't discovered the "optimistic" setting yet it's a great feature that allows you to choose what OC you want.Īrray JustinThyme PC Specs JustinThyme PC SpecsĦ4GB DDR4 8x8 Corsair Dominator Platinum 3800 MHz C17Įxternal Audioengine D1 24 bit 192kbps DAC Played 3 hours of bfv and got a max pkg temp of 73 though most of the time it was below 60. Running cinebench gave a max package temp of 75. Ran an hour of p95 which it sailed through but non of the cores really went passed 4.6 ghz which was a bit weird so temps never went passed 60. Booted with that setting and am now running with a 5.2ghz oc on all cores. Turned that down from 100 to 93, pressed enter and it gave a 5.2ghz oc. Turns out there's an "optimistic" setting in the AI facility. It gave me an oc of 5.6 ghz which I thought was a bit optimistic. Set bios to default, ran prime 95 for an hour then went back into bios and set AI oc'ing to run. I've just been having a mess with the AI oc'ing on my hero xi mb with a 9700k chip.